Monday, April 23, 2012

The House on Mango Street - Reflection




      At first, I completely despised this novel. I thought that the structure of this piece created a disjointed mood that failed to reflect the plot and distracted from the overall fluidity of the novel. The lack of character development predetermined any possible connection that I might have had with the protagonist to be nonexistent. This may sound harsh, but my favorite part of the novel was its brevity in length.  Despite my obvious dislike for the structure and characterization, there were a few intriguing characteristics that I enjoyed.
         I found the motif of names extremely interesting. This is probably because the concept of identity and search for self-definition are thematically more universal than “Hair” or provocative shoes.  The coming-of-age theme is prevalent in this aspect of the novel.  Esperanza is an adolescent girl trapped in the struggle between defining herself as a woman or a girl.  She is conflicted by her desire for the conceptual nature of womanhood, while not fully understanding that she is unprepared for the psychological and physical ramifications inherent in this maturation.  This burden is thrust upon after she is sexually assaulted, and consequently she suddenly resents all women for idealizing sex. She is upset with other females for not educating her on what sex is really like and causing her to create unrealistic expectations that ultimately do nothing but let her down. The aspect of this that interests me the most is how spontaneous this transition from adolescence to womanhood seems to be. While the author uses this sexual encounter as a hallmark of maturation, I think that there are many different events that could act as similar catalyst for this personal growth. However, I agree with the spontaneity of this personal change. I don’t believe that one can just wake up one day and decide that they have matured from adolescence to a man or woman. This maturation is a result of many different experiences and how one chooses to act in these given situations. One prevalent issue in today’s society is how much incongruence lies in what most adolescents expect their future to hold and what actually takes place. Society and social media has for a long time been the source of unheralded and unrealistic expectations of life in general. We live in a culture that relies on miracles and dreams in order to maintain hope in our futures. Contrary to this idea, when a family turns on the 10 ‘o clock news, there are never specials on the man who didn’t win the lottery, the woman who didn’t get the promotion, or the boy who hasn’t woken up from a coma. Regardless, I feel this sentiment is exhibited by Esperanza following her sexual assault.
       Oddly enough, I found the chapter “Four Skinny Trees” particularly inspiring. Esperanza found a personal connection with the four skinny trees that should not have grown or exist where they do, but live on regardless of their unfavorable circumstance. This symbol fuels her dreams and gives her hope.
       I also found the criticism of this novel quite interesting; particularly the remarks that called the novel a betrayal of the “barrio”. I would agree that for a large portion of the novel the protagonists’ main agenda is to leave the barrio and there are symbols, such as the four skinny trees that support this. However, the conversation Esperanza has at the end of the novel with the elderly aunts seems to contradict this idea. The aunts remind Esperanza to come back to the barrio after she leaves. It seems to me like life in a Latin based neighborhood is not a favorable one, and the only way to both maintain the cultural aspects of the barrio and improve its infrastructure would be to bring outside education back to the barrio. My point of view is probably ignorant, but it is difficult for me to see any merit in continuing a way of life that is obviously degrading in at least an economical sense. I can understand wanting to maintain one’s cultural roots, but not in a way that leaves a community with no future but to become a relic.
      This novel seems like a cultural statement that was made without fully thinking through the concepts inherent in the piece. There are a couple chapters I feel are completely irrelevant and useless. Despite my discontent with the novel, the cultural ramifications of the story and certain motifs made reading this narrative at least somewhat interesting. 

No comments:

Post a Comment